I’m
neither an archivist nor a researcher. I don’t save collectibles or search the
internet for the latest trendy thing to put on my back or in a shelf. I do,
however, have an insatiable interest in the late 50s and the decade of the 60s.
In past blogs, I’ve described the 60’s as my ‘lost years.’ Nearly ten years
wandering and wondering through a turbulent period of growth amid this
country’s many changes.
Growing
up during that period, Playboy magazine was the ‘dirty magazine’ hidden behind
drug store counters. Retailers dared not display it on the regular magazine
racks unless the magazine came with its standardized strip of modesty covering
up her bottom. Of course, that only ignited a young boy’s imagination up
another dozen notches.
Back
then, the cliché went: I was supposed to claim that I read Playboy for the
articles, not the pictures. Actually I did neither. I can’t remember if it was
the cost that was prohibitive or where to stash it that hindered my ever
purchasing one. It could also have been the fact that I was too embarrassed to
actually drop a Playboy on the counter in front of an adult and buy it.
That
all changed recently. With the power of E-Bay, I now have a very limited
collection of Playboy magazines from 1968 and 1969 with a few extra months
thrown in. It’s been an absolutely fascinating journey back in time and I’m not
talking about the centerfolds. Nowadays I can honestly say I read my old
Playboys for the articles instead of perusing the pictures.
Taken
within the context of their time, I think the articles accurately reflect the
mindset, morals and mores of that (my) generation. Back then, each monthly
column seemed to raise a different group of concerns but all of them relevant
to the times.
The
Playboy Advisor seemed to focus on dating advice, job advancement, personal
hygiene and the like. The Playboy Forum covered the topics of homosexuality,
pornography, premarital sex and sex education. The Playboy Philosophy column
was Hugh Hefner’s private platform to rail against the prudish old society
standards of morality. He challenged the hypocrisy of our social, civic and
political leaders against the changing times.
While
seeming to cover different topics of interest, the columns all backed a solid
philosophy that reflected Hugh Hefner’s take on present-day issues facing
Americans in the late fifties and early sixties. What struck me was the
sincerity and honest probing of moral standards handed down through the
generations that were now being challenged by magazines like Playboy, comedians
like Lenny Bruce and young college students no longer willing to quietly
embrace the status quo their parents had readily accepted after the war.
The
older generation, alarmed by the subtle yet pervasive changes bubbling up among
the younger set, voiced their opposition to anything that challenged their
well-established way of life. There was, among other things, a genuine alarm
about the growth of sex education classes in schools. Their old familiar fear
of a ‘communist plot’ against the moral thread of American society was raised. In
their mind, challenges to authority were not to be tolerated if this country
was to survive, they argued. Hippies and other radicals were labeled subversive
because they seemed intent on overthrowing the government. Rock and rollers,
especially those in the psychedelic movement, were among the worst offenders. Adding
to this growing alarm at new thoughts and ideas was a burgeoning concern for
the ‘negro cause,’ rights for the ‘homosexual’, ‘women’s liberation’ and the
legalization of marijuana.
But
along with the sometimes amusing, always serious concerns of the day came an
onslaught of old familiar advertising that I hadn’t seen in many years. The
advertising, as much as the various columns, truly painted an accurate picture
of life in America in the sixties. Only this time I was able to peruse and
enjoy the images and copy lines with a little more miles and maturity under my
belt.
The
advertising images came rushing back, primarily from cigarette, car and beer
ads. In an era when smoking was still thought to be cool and not harmful,
cigarette makers all vied for a place in front of cool hip young men. Among the
relics of that era were ads for Pall Mall Gold, Camel, Lark, Winston, Tareyton,
Tiparillo LP, Silva Thin, and Chesterfield.
Beer
ads were just as prominent with Colt 45 Malt Liquor, Schlitz, Michelob and
Heineken. For world travelers TWA and Braniff painted colorful pictures of
foreign travel, always with a beautiful blond in the seat next-door. The
Triumph Spitfire ($2199) and Compact Dodge Dart were offered up as affordable
means of transportation with sex appeal.
Cricketeer,
h.i.s. , Wembley, Jaymar slacks and Botany 500 were aimed at the college crowd
while London Fog, Hathaway (the eye patch guy) and Hart Schaffner & Marx
were aimed at those with more discretionary tastes in clothing. Both
demographics were exposed to the Columbia Stereo tape club, the Encyclopedia
Britannica and who can forget a library full of Great Books. Of course, no date
would be ready to go without a liberal sprinkling of Old Spice and/or English
Leather cologne.
Some
of those advertising lines have been cemented in advertising history. ‘I’d walk a mile for a Camel.’ ‘Come to where
the flavor is. Come to Marlboro Country.’ and
‘Real gusto in a great light beer (Schlitz)’ have all stood the test of
time.
There
were several recurring segments including solid business advice by J. Paul
Getty, image-making by LeRoy Neiman with his ‘Man at his Leisure’ series of
paintings and sketches and, of course, a history of celluloid sex.
But
the best advertisement that summarized the whole playboy philosophy was their
monthly ad entitled ‘Who reads Playboy magazine.’ It never showed a horny
eighteen year old boy; their real target reader. Instead it displayed a thirty
year old male model draped in the latest fashion duds with a girl (never a
woman) wrapped around his arm.
By
the early 70s, reaction to the feminist movement was raising its ever curious
and alarmed head. It seemed to be the militant feminists who were causing the
greatest concerns among the stanch old guard who felt threatened by the daughters
of the ‘little woman’ back home. The unwillingness of these brave young women
to not accept the status quo of the last twenty years of Playboy brought the
magazine to its zenith and then inevitable decline.
Social,
sexual, and political differences aside, these magazines provide an insightful
journey back in time with their advice columns and Playboy Philosophy sections
that plum the most definitive explanations of the country’s mindset and
political and moral forces fighting against the myriad of changes during that
time period.
As
much as the federal government, most southern states, neighborhood moral
harbingers of faith and local politicians wanted to turn back the tide of
change, they couldn’t. Playboy in its editorial themes, personality interviews
and revealing pictorials represented those changes sweeping the country. It wasn’t
just the sexual revolution or civil rights or distrust of the war in Vietnam,
it was an awakening of the youth that they didn’t have to follow in the footsteps
of their parents… and they probably wouldn’t go to hell if they didn’t.
These
old magazines are a time capsule of my political, social, sexual, and cultural
wallpaper back in the Sixties. Those ‘real world’ anthropological studies
reflected many of our country’s morals, hang-ups, misconceptions, prejudices,
assumptions and naivete most of which have all been washed away by time and
fact.
What
is both insightful and pathetic at the same time was their advertising campaign
bolstering the Playboy image. It was that imaginative facade of the cool sophisticated
male in his Playboy penthouse, driving fast cars, going on exotic vacations and
having nightly rendezvous at some dark, smoky jazz club where ‘lucky’ was the
constant number, that propelled this multi-million dollar industry. Carefully
crafted, it was all part of the mystic, lore, stories, lies, wet dreams and
rampant imagination that Hefner had his readers connect with. With a monthly
circulation of just under three million and at .60 cents a pop, the
man/publisher/image-maker was clearly on to something.
Studied
at length the magazines paint a primitive yet persuasive picture of the typical
‘man about town.’ It was a wonderful caricature imagined in the mind of Hugh
Hefner and visualized in photographs, paintings, suggestive cartoons and the
ever-present ‘girl next door’ sans her clothing. Unfortunately, I bought into
Hef’s dream - hook, line and sinker, especially the sinker part.
The
most impactful of these delusions about the Playboy image occurred in the fall
of 1964 when I was stationed at the Presidio of San Francisco. While lounging
in the enlisted men’s rec. room, I happened upon the Fall Campus Edition of
Playboy. There, spread out before my envious eyes, were beautiful coeds,
Mustang convertibles and fashion-conscious jocks lounging about the quad in
their latest duds and school flags. It was a world that seemed a million miles
away and a lifetime out of reach. It made me sad, envious, and just a little
bit lecherous looking at those beautiful girls.
As
I learned over time, the girls or really the carefully crafted manikins’ of the
same persuasion were wonderful dangling carrots to dream about as I carved out
an existence while serving Uncle Sam. Upon my discharge, the illusions
disappeared and reality with all of its warts, dreams and reality-bites took
its place. As we used to say: ‘Welcome back to the real world.’ Then I would
add with a grin ‘but thanks for the dreams along the way.’
The
dreams have long since faded and reality has painted a much more honest,
realistic portrait of those turbulent years. Now with a pillow of time to rest
on, I can go back with an open mind and comfort-with-self to look with
amusement at the pictorials, advertisements, philosophies, and righteous stands
on morality and ask ‘what has changed?’
The
moral indignities of some will always confuse and amuse others. The quest for
freedom will never end. Hopefully we’ve learned to be kinder to others, more
accepting and willing to stand up to the myriad of challenges we still face. As
the quote goes: ‘That was another time and place.’ While its fun to look over
the fast cars, inhale the soft skin and seductive smile, reality is a much
better way to live in the end.
For
to live any other way is not to live…and who wants to exist that way.