He always seems to be mad at something, about something, against something, because of something. That ‘something’ can range from government action, inaction, the governor himself, politicians (unless they see it his way), taxes of any kind, liberals, young people, women, old people, minorities, immigrants…. And the list just goes on and on.
He always has excuses for Trump’s behavior and that of his fellow
Republicans. Yet, if I asked him to define his version of conservatism, he
probably couldn’t. In the history of modern American conservatism, there were
three distinct waves of change. The first wave was best symbolized by William
F. Buckley and Ronald Reagan. The second wave, by Paul Ryan and two Bush
presidencies and the third, now best represented by the sometimes confusing,
sometimes scary present party in power.
If I were a betting man, I’d say his philosophies run more along the lines of ‘I just heard it on Fox, so it has to be true.’ Like many of us programmed to believe the ads of the sixties, what he sees and hears, he believes. Political news on the radio that morning is gospel and can’t be challenged. Even my occasional ‘You’ve got to be fricken kidding me’ doesn’t seem to faze him or his firm belief that if they ‘said it on radio,’ it has to be true.
He doesn’t respect women and, in fact, seems to fear their intellect,
power and agility in the face of stupidity. In other words, normal strengths
given to the more powerful of the tribe. Any man who doesn’t see women as an
equal missed that train a long time ago.
![]() |
Photo courtesy of Bob Getterz |
It was so much easier when we were all younger and the biggest argument centered around which radio station, KDWB or WDGY, was the best Rock and Roll station in town (the twin cities of Minnesota.) Oh, for those happy days again.
While my friend is ‘a piece of work’, we have actually found, somehow, common
ground upon which to carry on some pretty interesting, stimulating and
intelligent conversations. The key I discovered, right up front, was to respect
his point of view even if he didn’t know what the hell he was talking about … from
my point of view, of course.
Without apology, I willingly conceded that my ‘left wing crazies’ were
just as off the charts as were his ‘right wing crazies.’ We agreed that term
limits should have been placed on most if not all politicians starting with
George Washington. We agreed that down through the ages both parties were
guilty of any and every indiscretion, crime, unethical, and immoral action
possible. We agreed that a good number of politicians’ only real focus is to
get reelected which they, in turn, see as their sacred duty to their constituency.
Most self-serving politicians speak out of both sides of their mouths,
depending which way the political winds are blowing ‘that day.’
Having agreed on some of those basics, my ‘friend’ and I are actually able to find even more common ground in which to have calm, ‘mostly’ rational conversations. He plays the stock market every day and seems to understand value-investing. He studies trends, changing political winds, the economy and makes his decisions based on his own gut appraisal of the marketplace. And he seems to be doing pretty well at it. Of course, he is also an avid gambler and I suspect loses much more than he would care to admit.
Ninety-nine times out of ten, I find our conversations quite educational. I like to hear about stock market trends, emerging companies, particular stocks and the current take on the market from one who plays it on a daily basis. Just to catch a glimpse into his slant on things is fascinating for me as a writer and ever-present voyeur into other people’s lives.
I’ve told my friend that one of my greatest strengths is knowing and
admitting that there is so much I don’t know about everything; the stock market
in particular. The handlers of Sharon’s retirement account and the good folks
at Ameriprise have placed us in stocks and bonds that fit our (not too)
conservative approach to the market. It seems to work for us and I don’t lose
sleep at night no matter what gyrations the market is going through on any
given day. I can’t say the same for my friend.
I think that Noam Chomsky in his book: ‘Requiem for the American Dream’ is able to capture the essence of my friend’s grudge with the world. He says: “There’s unfocused anger going on in self-destructive directions.” He calls this phenomenon ‘generalized rage.’ “It’s most white, working-class, lower-middle-class people, who have been cast by the wayside during the neoliberalism period. Everything has been taken away from them (they feel). There is no economic growth for them, this is for other people. The institutions are all against them. They have a deep concern that they are losing their country because a ‘generalized they’ are taking it away from them.”
Interestingly enough, I meet several guys like that in the service, determined to save their country from the perceived threats within. While my friend and I have never directly addressed this particular slant on life, it certainly sounds like him from everything he’s said to me. I have several other acquaintances back home like the one here. Their political slant on life is so different from mine that only by finding slivers of commonality between us can we keep our conversations going.
One thing that struck me, right from the beginning, was the sincerity
from which my friends claimed their knowledge and defense of their political
views. It’s hard to argue with someone who feels that passionately about
things. It calls for respect in the face of (my own) reality and the challenge
of trying to see the argument in question from their point of view.
Yet, like so many other challenges in life, I see it as a win-win situation. If my friend is able to change my point of view, that’s great, I’ve learned something new that day. If not, then my own point of view (after calm, thorough examination) has been justified and reinforced. I win either way.
I hope I can say the same for my ‘friend.’